The Reckoner!

Could General Meade have ended the Civil War at Gettysburg?

Despite winning a decisive victory at Gettysburg, General Meade was in President Lincoln's doghouse for not aggressively persuing the Army of Northern Virginia to prevent them from recrossing the Potomic river back to the south.

Meade's men were exhausted from three days of heavy fighting and had sustained heavy losses, but his army was still well supplied and could yet draw on reserves.  The Southern army had also sustained very heavy losses, but was in substantially worse condition -- short on supplies and not on home ground.

Nonetheless, General Lee's army slipped away during the night after waiting out a miserable day in the rain-soaked Pennsylvania countryside, trying to escape the Federals before they counterattacked.  The Army of Northern Virginia was gone before General Meade realized it and had a good head start on its way south, though it was slowed by long wagon trains of wounded.

If General Meade had somehow beaten the Army of Northern Virginia to the river, it would have been trapped and perhaps completely lost....possibly ending the war.  However, Lee was a superb defensive fighter and Meade was worried about possibly turning his victory into a defeat.  As it was, the retreat devolved into a series of defensive scraps with the Army of Northern Virginia successfully recrossing the river to the safety of the south.

Should Meade have thrown caution to the wind and gone for the big kill?

Reckoning Results!
Go for it Meade!
Caution Meade! Be careful
They're on the ropes!
Why risk a great victory?
Previous Reckoning!
Ricky Gervais! Comedic genius, or mean spirited lout?
Next Reckoning!
Baked Potato. Do you eat the skin?

Reckoning Comments!

Meade had just gotten command of the Army of the Potomac before Gettysburg kicked into gear, and I doubt he felt confident that he could launch an offensive with the newly formed chains of command.  As it was, it was a minor miracle that they had held together at Gettysburg, and that was on some of the best defensive terrain of the entire war.

If they'd gone in for the kill, I feel pretty confident that they would have bungled it.  It rained all day on July 4th that year, and the offensive conditions would've been lousy.  Lincoln got on Meade's back because he was so accustomed to his main generals being either comically timid (McClellan) or incompetent (Burnside), so once he knew that Meade was competent, he just couldn't bear to see the timidity.

Hindsight is always the best sight!!! Who really could have gone either way, so I guess Meade didn't want to take the chance....

There is another question sort of similar in nature regarding a much later war... If President George HW Bush, had invaded Bagdad and deposed of Sadaam Hussein during the Persian Gulf War...Would that have stopped the US from having to invade Bagdad later to kill Hussein and get involved heavily in the Iraq war????

Again...maybe....maybe not!!!

The Reckoner!